![[PukiWiki]](image/pukiwiki.png "[PukiWiki]")
#author("2024-12-07T08:17:15+09:00","","") Freeze-drying is a complex process despite the relatively small number of steps involved, since the freezing, sublimation, desorption, and reconstitution processes all play a part in determining the success or otherwise of the final product qualities, and each stage can impose different stresses on a product. This is particularly the case with many fragile biological samples, which require great care in the selection of formulation additives such as protective agents and other stabilizers. Despite this, the process is widely used, not least because once any such processing stresses can be overcome, the result is typically a significantly more stable product than was the case with the starting material. Indeed, lyophilization may be considered a gentler method than conventional air-drying methods, which tend to apply heat to the product rather than starting by removing heat as is the case here. Additionally, due to the high surface area to volume ratio, freeze-dried materials tend to be drier than their conventionally dried counterparts and also rehydrate more rapidly. This chapter provides an overview of freeze-drying (lyophilization) of biological specimens with particular reference to the importance of formulation development, characterization, and cycle development factors necessary for the commercial exploitation of freeze-dried products, and reviews the recent developments in analytical methods which have come to underpin modern freeze-drying practice.Vitrification is an alternative to cryopreservation by freezing that enables hydrated living cells to be cooled to cryogenic temperatures in the absence of ice. Vitrification simplifies and frequently improves cryopreservation because it eliminates mechanical injury from ice, eliminates the need to find optimal cooling and warming rates, eliminates the importance of differing optimal cooling and warming rates for cells in mixed cell type populations, eliminates the need to find a frequently imperfect compromise between solution effects injury and intracellular ice formation, and can enable chilling injury to be "outrun" by using rapid cooling without a risk of intracellular ice formation. On the other hand, vitrification requires much higher concentrations of cryoprotectants than cryopreservation by freezing, which introduces greater risks of both osmotic damage and cryoprotectant toxicity. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/sodium-l-lactate.html Fortunately, a large number of remedies for the latter problem have been discovered over the past 35 years, and osmotic damage can in most cases be eliminated or adequately controlled by paying careful attention to cryoprotectant introduction and washout techniques. Vitrification therefore has the potential to enable the superior and convenient cryopreservation of a wide range of biological systems (including molecules, cells, tissues, organs, and even some whole organisms), and it is also increasingly recognized as a successful strategy for surviving harsh environmental conditions in nature. But the potential of vitrification is sometimes limited by an insufficient understanding of the complex physical and biological principles involved, and therefore a better understanding may not only help to improve present outcomes but may also point the way to new strategies that may be yet more successful in the future. This chapter accordingly describes the basic principles of vitrification and indicates the broad potential biological relevance of this alternative method of cryopreservation.Cryopreservation and freeze-drying can be used to preserve cells or tissues for prolonged periods. Vitrification, or ice-free cryopreservation, is an alternative to cryopreservation that enables cooling cells to cryogenic temperatures in the absence of ice. The processing pathways involved in (ice-free) cryopreservation and freeze-drying of cells and tissues, however, can be very damaging. In this chapter, we describe the principles underlying preservation of cells for which freezing and drying are normally lethal processes as well as for cells that are able to survive in a reversible state of suspended animation. Freezing results in solution effects injury and/or intracellular ice formation, whereas drying results in removal of (non-freezable) water normally bound to biomolecules, which is generally more damaging. Cryopreservation and freeze-drying require different types of protective agents. Different mechanistic modes of action of cryoprotective and lyoprotective agents are described including minimizing ice formation, preferential exclusion, water replacement, and vitrification. Furthermore, it is discussed how protective agents can be introduced into cells avoiding damage due to too large cell volume excursions, and how knowledge of cell-specific membrane permeability properties in various temperature regimes can be used to rationally design (ice-free) cryopreservation and freeze-drying protocols.Septic arthritis and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are conditions commonly associated with Gram-positive cocci, however, a drastic increase in cases derived from enterobacterial species has been observed. Recently it has been reported by multiple groups that staphylococci rapidly form free-floating aggregates in the presence of synovial fluid. These aggregates are comparatively more resistant to antimicrobial challenge than their planktonic counterparts, and thus may play a role in the pathogenesis of joint infection. While staphylococcal aggregates have been the primary focus of interest in the field, it is unclear just how widespread synovial fluid mediated aggregation (SFMA) is in Gram negative enterobacteria (GNE). Through this work we have evaluated SFMA in clinical GNE isolated from PJIs. Two PJI clinical strains each of Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia and Proteus mirabilis strains representing a range of antibiotic susceptibilities were exposed to 10% bovine synovial fluid supernatant (BSF) using a relatively simple, quick semi-quantitative method using an imaging plate reader. BSF stimulated aggregation within 0.5 h both strains of E. cloacae and P. mirabilis and one strain of E.coli. In one strain of P. mirabilis and E.coli, the size of the aggregates significantly increased from 0.5 to 2 h exposure. In contrast, neither K. pneumoniae strain aggregated in BSF. These preliminary findings show that aggregation can occur quickly in GNE, but the extent appears strain and species specific. Further work is required to assess the impact of SFMA on antibiotic tolerance, host innate immunity and the establishment of biofilms.
